<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Schilling clause??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/</link>
	<description>Curt Schilling's Official Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:39:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-32613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-32613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please run for office. We really need you NOW.
I pledge to do whatever I can to help you get elected.

Thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please run for office. We really need you NOW.<br />
I pledge to do whatever I can to help you get elected.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freak Show Espresso</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-23874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freak Show Espresso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-23874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great blog. Who knew a pitcher could write so well and make good points. KUDOS! Keep it going Curt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great blog. Who knew a pitcher could write so well and make good points. KUDOS! Keep it going Curt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tropicana340</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-23102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tropicana340]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-23102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curt,

I think you all are missing an important point.

Assume, for the sake of argument, that the winners of the Cy Young Award (and all other such awards for that matter) are determined perfectly... that there is never any dispute on the part of the players or fans and every year everyone unanimously agrees that the BBWAA (or whatever other body decides the winner) picked the person who had genuinely and unmistakably earned that award by their performance on the field of play.  Assume that to be the case for all sports and all awards for athletic performance.

Whether or not there is an explicit clause in a player&#039;s contract that allows for a bonus for winning such an award (or a vote for that player to win such an award), that player&#039;s compensation as a professional athlete will increase or decrease based upon that player&#039;s performance on the field of play.  Players who have won MVP&#039;s and Cy Young Awards etc. command a higher salary at the bargaining table not because of the name of the award or the entity that has awarded it but because the award evidences superior performance on the field of play.

If the five greatest pitchers in the league have contract clauses that award them bonuses for winning such awards such that the BBWAA (or whatever other body decides the winner) excludes them from consideration, those five greatest players will STILL command the biggest salaries based upon their performance on the field.  However, the significance of the &quot;Cy Young Award&quot; will be greatly diminished if people know those awards do not recognize the best players in the league.  At that point, such provisions will not appear in contracts NOT because the BBWAA has decreed that they will not consider players who have such provisions in their contracts but rather because players will not bother trying to put such provisions in their contracts because the teams and owners will know that winning such an award no longer means that player had a superior performance that year.

In short, the BBWAA has confused cause and effect.  A player&#039;s performance on the field of play is the cause, the Cy Young Award (and an increased salary) is the effect.  The Cy Young Award does not cause superior perfomance on the field of play and it does not cause an increased salary EXCEPT to the extent that it reflects that player&#039;s performance on the field of play.  The moment the Cy Young Award ceases to reflect the performance of the players on the field of play is the moment that the Cy Young Award&#039;s loses all significance.

-Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt,</p>
<p>I think you all are missing an important point.</p>
<p>Assume, for the sake of argument, that the winners of the Cy Young Award (and all other such awards for that matter) are determined perfectly&#8230; that there is never any dispute on the part of the players or fans and every year everyone unanimously agrees that the BBWAA (or whatever other body decides the winner) picked the person who had genuinely and unmistakably earned that award by their performance on the field of play.  Assume that to be the case for all sports and all awards for athletic performance.</p>
<p>Whether or not there is an explicit clause in a player&#8217;s contract that allows for a bonus for winning such an award (or a vote for that player to win such an award), that player&#8217;s compensation as a professional athlete will increase or decrease based upon that player&#8217;s performance on the field of play.  Players who have won MVP&#8217;s and Cy Young Awards etc. command a higher salary at the bargaining table not because of the name of the award or the entity that has awarded it but because the award evidences superior performance on the field of play.</p>
<p>If the five greatest pitchers in the league have contract clauses that award them bonuses for winning such awards such that the BBWAA (or whatever other body decides the winner) excludes them from consideration, those five greatest players will STILL command the biggest salaries based upon their performance on the field.  However, the significance of the &#8220;Cy Young Award&#8221; will be greatly diminished if people know those awards do not recognize the best players in the league.  At that point, such provisions will not appear in contracts NOT because the BBWAA has decreed that they will not consider players who have such provisions in their contracts but rather because players will not bother trying to put such provisions in their contracts because the teams and owners will know that winning such an award no longer means that player had a superior performance that year.</p>
<p>In short, the BBWAA has confused cause and effect.  A player&#8217;s performance on the field of play is the cause, the Cy Young Award (and an increased salary) is the effect.  The Cy Young Award does not cause superior perfomance on the field of play and it does not cause an increased salary EXCEPT to the extent that it reflects that player&#8217;s performance on the field of play.  The moment the Cy Young Award ceases to reflect the performance of the players on the field of play is the moment that the Cy Young Award&#8217;s loses all significance.</p>
<p>-Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkmmtwg</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-22642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkmmtwg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-22642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think players who win MVP&#039;s, CY Young&#039;s, &amp; Rookie of the Year Awards, and Gold Gloves should be monetarily compensated. I just think that it shouldn&#039;t be the individual team&#039;s responsibility to add clauses to contracts, I think all team owners should contribute to a pot that the league controls that makes up the bonuses. For example: A Cy Young Award is worth 5 to 10 million, an MVP is worth 5 to 10 million, a Rookie of the Year is worth 1 to 5 million, and a Gold Glove is worth anywhere from 100K to 500K depending on the position played.

This added bonus would be incentive for every player in the league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think players who win MVP&#8217;s, CY Young&#8217;s, &amp; Rookie of the Year Awards, and Gold Gloves should be monetarily compensated. I just think that it shouldn&#8217;t be the individual team&#8217;s responsibility to add clauses to contracts, I think all team owners should contribute to a pot that the league controls that makes up the bonuses. For example: A Cy Young Award is worth 5 to 10 million, an MVP is worth 5 to 10 million, a Rookie of the Year is worth 1 to 5 million, and a Gold Glove is worth anywhere from 100K to 500K depending on the position played.</p>
<p>This added bonus would be incentive for every player in the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soxfandavevingoshen</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-21021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soxfandavevingoshen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-21021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really?  I don&#039;t understand why that would be.  But I&#039;m a nothin&#039; ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  I don&#8217;t understand why that would be.  But I&#8217;m a nothin&#8217; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baseballvictim</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[baseballvictim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nolan Ryan did not deserve to go in his first time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nolan Ryan did not deserve to go in his first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attyrosa</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20878</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[attyrosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t help it ... I&#039;m a Yankee fan! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help it &#8230; I&#8217;m a Yankee fan! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attyrosa</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[attyrosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t all this discussion for nothing? You don&#039;t really think you are going to actually pitch that well, do you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t all this discussion for nothing? You don&#8217;t really think you are going to actually pitch that well, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeynarrative</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeynarrative]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 13:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the decision by the writers.  

Nothing against Curt personally but with the image problems the game has been having, the commodification of awards is something else to turn people off.

The potential perception problems are too great.  Imagine if a writer who is chummy with a player votes for that player?  Cries of &quot;kickback&quot; are sure to follow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the decision by the writers.  </p>
<p>Nothing against Curt personally but with the image problems the game has been having, the commodification of awards is something else to turn people off.</p>
<p>The potential perception problems are too great.  Imagine if a writer who is chummy with a player votes for that player?  Cries of &#8220;kickback&#8221; are sure to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt24</title>
		<link>http://38pitches.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curt24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://38pitches.com/2007/12/05/the-schilling-clause/#comment-20806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Curt,

Why don&#039;t you just use this website to raise money for charity?   Why do you use it to give your opinion on topics that have nothing to do with your charitable endeavours?

Sincerely,
A regurlar Human Being.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Curt,</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you just use this website to raise money for charity?   Why do you use it to give your opinion on topics that have nothing to do with your charitable endeavours?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
A regurlar Human Being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

